About your Search

20121112
20121120
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)
regulations is not surprising. >> andrea: they don't have to do with just healthcare, they deal with energy. a huge job creator. head of the chamber of commerce was on cavuto and said energy, that is what where we will get jobs. the feds will close off more federal land a.m. even though obama said in the debate no, we haven't. we're going to open them up. we have. >> dana: great american success story in innovation and ingenuity of technology created that is now putting america on a path to become less dependent on foreign sources of energy. that is true on state and private property. not true on the federal land, because they are pecked to death by ducks. every governor is coming up with a different plan. not only if you are an energy company do you teal with the federal government regulations you have the state government regulations that are varying. oil doesn't respect state borders. so on the energy side of thing, a big deal. also on banking and financial regulations. there is one industry that helps. lawyers. they will pore over the regulations. >> andrea: don't you think a lot of peo
with climate change and energy. and he seemed to really downplay any expectations of sweeping energy and climate change legislation. saying instead that he was focusing first on the economy and creating jobs. >> i am a firm believer that climate change is real, that it has impacted -- as a consequence i think we have an obligation to future generations to do something about it. and understandably i think the american people right now have been so focused and will continue to be focused on our economy and jobs and growth that if the message is somehow we're going to ignore jobs and growth simply to address climate change, i don't think anybody's going to go for that. i won't go for that. >> reporter: now, wolf, president obama said that more needs to be done. but he says he wants to have a national conversation talking to scientists, elected officials, engineers. so keeping it very broad. not getting into specifics. not talking about the sweeping energy and climate change legislation. but when you're talking to folks on both sides of this, those who are environmentalists, those who ar
the conversation. one is for a clean, wedomestic energy future that puts us in control. our abundant natural gas is already saving us money, producing cleaner electricity, putting us to work here in america and supporting wind and solar. though all energy development comes with some risk, we're committed to safely and responsibly producing natural gas. it's not a dream. america's natural gas... putting us in control of our energy future, now. >>> so where do republicans go from here, a week after the party stinging defeat. jack cafferty is following that in the cafferty file. >> wolf, to say the gop needs to do some soul searching in the aftermath of the 2012 election might be putting it mildly. while mitt romney failed to connect with the majority of american voters, the republicans' problem is a whole lot bigger than mitt romney. as one long time republican leader told politico, the gop needs to realize it is too old, too white, too male, maybe even want to add too rich to that. this republican says the party has to figure out how to catch up with demographics of a changing u.s. before it is t
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)